Indicators are often treated as neutral measures of progress. In practice, they only make sense through judgement, conversation, and institutional context. Drawing on place-based environmental programmes, this post reflects on why indicators need to be revisited, interpreted, and sometimes reworked
As AI moves from individual use into meetings, workshops, strategy sessions, and collaborative writing, it increasingly enters the room with us. Some find this useful, while others experience unease, often voiced in terms of the tools themselves. Looked at more
Experienced reviewers will recognise that peer review is rarely straightforward. Some of the hardest moments tend to sit not in applying criteria for methodology or technique, but in how judgement is exercised, how a paper is being read, and where
People working in place-based, multi-actor initiatives do not need convincing that their world is complex. The harder question is how to organise that work in ways that reduce friction, support good decisions, and hold up over time. This reflection looks
As commentators argue over whether COP30 was a failure or a fragile step forward, this post looks at the summit through a transition lens. It explores what happens when many actors try to move together, why COPs are better at
Scaling is often understood as taking a successful approach and expanding it to new places or larger populations. Yet in complex, multi-actor settings such as development, environmental management, health, and community-led change, change rarely travels so neatly. This post reflects
Many of us focus on the tools and strategies for change, yet much depends on how we show up with one another. This piece reflects on the inner side of sustainability practice and how the Inner Development Goals offer one
A short introduction for those who want to use AI to support thinking, reflection, and preparation in their work. This post offers a simple way to shape prompts that keep human judgement, relationships, and context at the centre. In an
We’re often told to think systematically or embrace complexity. But real-world collaboration requires both. This reflection invites practitioners into the productive middle ground – where structure and emergence work as partners. It offers questions and examples from practice, not another
People working in climate adaptation and other complex settings do not need convincing that their world is complex. The harder question is how to navigate that complexity in ways that help with real decisions, relationships, and risks, rather than adding
This site curates annotated links to tools and frameworks for people working in complex, multi-actor settings. It also shows how different dimensions of practice fit together across real-world contexts.
If you’re looking for tailored support – whether that’s short advisory input, process design, reflective coaching, or strategic writing – you’re welcome to get in touch or visit my bio and services page to learn more. I work collaboratively on facilitation, evaluation, and learning design, often during early-stage or time-limited phases.
Visit some of my reflections on collaborative practice and learning in complex, multi-actor settings.
This site is free for everyone, but not free to maintain. If you find it useful, you might consider a small contribution, about the cost of a cup of coffee, to help keep it going.
Visit core pages introducing key themes, approaches, and frameworks for supporting collaboration and learning in complex, multi-actor contexts.
